UBC Reports | Vol.
51 | No. 6 |
Jun. 2, 2005
Dear UBC Reports:
In the last issue you published a summary of a lengthy Globe
and Mail article in which I was quoted several times. The
original article came periously close to misrepresenting my
views. Your summary completely inverted them. Regarding the
two points you chose to summarize, let me clarify: 1. The
Singh decision has nothing to do with Hargit Singh; 2. Humanitarian
and compassionate exceptions have little to do with humanitarianism
or compassion.
Thank you,
Catherine Dauvergne
Assoc. Professor
Faculty of Law
